Claude for Lawyers
Law Firm SEOVendor SelectionRed FlagsMarketing

9 Red Flags Your Law Firm SEO Company Is Ripping You Off

Claude for Lawyers··8 min read

How to Tell If Your SEO Company Is Ripping You Off

You can usually tell within one conversation: ask them to list exactly what they did for you last month, in plain English, with the pages, links, and changes named. A legitimate vendor answers in two minutes. A bad one deflects to jargon, dashboards, or promises. The nine red flags below are the specific patterns lawyers describe over and over in r/LawFirm and r/Lawyertalk after getting burned, and every one of them is checkable before you sign, or today, against your current vendor.

1. They Cannot Explain What You Are Paying For

Why it happens: opacity is the business model. The FindLaw pattern is the canonical case. One lawyer's description on r/LawFirm: they cannot explain how they accomplished what they did or what you are paying for, they produce almost no results, and then they try and bully you when you push back. Vagueness lets a vendor bill the same retainer whether they worked forty hours or four.

What good looks like: an itemized monthly account of work performed: which pages were written or changed, what technical fixes shipped, which links or citations were built. If they built it, they can name it.

2. Twelve-Month Lock-In Contracts

Why it happens: lock-ins exist to keep collecting after you have noticed nothing is happening. The pitch is that SEO takes time, which is true, and is precisely why it makes such good cover for a vendor doing nothing for months while the contract runs.

What good looks like: month-to-month terms, or a fixed-scope project with a defined end. Notice that reputable agencies now advertise no long-term contracts as a selling point. They are telling you what the industry norm is by bragging about not doing it.

3. You Do Not Own Your Website or Content

Why it happens: rented proprietary-platform sites, the FindLaw and Scorpion-style model, are the ultimate retention device. Leave, and your site, your content, sometimes even your domain stay behind. Lawyers discover this at cancellation, when the leverage is maximal.

What good looks like: you own the domain, the site runs on a standard open platform, all content is your property in writing, and you hold the registrar and hosting logins. Ask before signing: if we part ways tomorrow, what exactly do I keep? The only acceptable answer is everything.

4. The Price Is $250 to $500 a Month

Why it happens: real SEO work, research, writing, technical fixes, outreach, cannot be delivered for $250 a month by anyone competent. That price funds a report and maybe a directory submission. Lawyers who have been through it are blunt: nobody hires a $250-a-month SEO company and gets good rankings, and the less you spend, the higher the chance you get ripped off.

What good looks like: pricing that maps to actual labor. Legitimate small-firm retainers start around $1,500 a month, or a fixed project fee in the low thousands with a defined deliverable list. Cheap SEO is not a bargain; it is a different product called reporting. The full pricing landscape is broken down in what law firm SEO actually costs.

5. Guaranteed Rankings

Why it happens: guarantees close deals with buyers who cannot evaluate the work. Nobody controls Google, so the guarantee is engineered to be unfalsifiable: rank number one for a keyword nobody searches, or refund terms hedged into meaninglessness.

What good looks like: honest probability language, keywords tied to real client searches, and accountability through transparency rather than fake certainty. Google itself warns against firms that guarantee rankings.

6. No Deliverables List

Why it happens: a contract for ongoing SEO services with nothing enumerated is a contract to do anything, including nothing. This is how firms pay for a full 30 days, then 60, then 90, and get, as one burned lawyer put it, nothing, nada, all zeros.

What good looks like: the proposal names counts and items: how many pages, which technical work, what schema, which citations, what gets delivered by when. If they will not write it down before you sign, they do not plan to do it after.

7. Reports Full of Vanity Metrics, Zero Signed Cases

Why it happens: impressions, sessions, and ranking movements for obscure terms always go up somewhere, so they make reassuring charts. What lawyers actually keep asking on Reddit is whether their agency is giving them quality leads, and vanity reports are designed to never answer that.

What good looks like: reporting anchored to consultations booked and cases signed, with call tracking and form attribution so you can trace revenue to the channel. Traffic is an input. Cases are the output.

8. Near-Duplicate Doorway Pages at Scale

Why it happens: generating fifty city pages that swap the place name is cheap and looks like work. It is also exactly what Google's scaled-content and doorway-page policies target. You carry the penalty risk; the vendor invoices either way.

What good looks like: location and practice pages that differ substantively, local detail, jurisdiction-specific answers, distinct real searches served. Volume is fine; lazy duplication is the violation. Spot-check any vendor's past work: open three of their location pages side by side and see if only the city name changes.

9. Total Silence About AI Search

Why it happens: in 2026, a meaningful share of prospective clients start with ChatGPT or Perplexity, and Google's AI Overviews now sit above the rankings your vendor sells you. A vendor who never mentions any of this is running a 2019 playbook, either from ignorance or because their template pipeline cannot produce the structured, answer-shaped content AI systems cite.

What good looks like: a concrete point of view on AI visibility: schema, question-formatted content, entity consistency, and checking how your firm actually appears in AI answers. The background is in law firm SEO in the AI era. You do not need a separate AI package; you need a vendor whose normal work already accounts for it.

The Questions to Ask Any Vendor Before Signing

  • What exactly will you deliver in the first 90 days? List the items.
  • If I cancel, what do I own: domain, site, content, analytics, all logins?
  • What is the contract term, and what does ending it cost?
  • Show me last month's work log for a current client, redacted is fine.
  • How do you report signed cases, not just traffic?
  • What is your approach to AI search and AI Overviews?
  • Do you guarantee rankings? The correct answer is no.

A good vendor answers all seven easily. A bad one gets vague, or bullies. Before you evaluate anyone, it is also worth confirming SEO makes sense for your practice at all; the honest framework is in our break-even analysis for small firms.

We built our offer as the answer to this list: a complete rebuild for a fixed $4,900, $2,450 to start, no retainer, no lock-in, and you own every page, file, and login from day one.

Related Reading

Want this done for your firm?

We rebuild law firm websites for Google and AI engines — SEO, AEO, and GEO in one project, live in 21 days. $2,450 starts it.

See the Offer