Document Key Points Extractor
When you receive any document — letter, filing, contract, court order — and need to understand it quickly before deciding on next steps.
Lawyers receive a constant stream of documents — opposing counsel letters, court orders, contract amendments, client correspondence — and each one demands a fast read before any decision can be made. The bottleneck is rarely understanding the law; it is the time spent locating the obligations, deadlines, and traps buried in dense prose. A reliable first-pass extraction turns a twenty-minute read into a two-minute scan.
This is exactly the kind of structured, repeatable task Claude does well. Paste in the document, tell it your role, and it returns the handful of points that actually matter: key terms, what each party must do, the risks worth flagging, and the concrete next steps. Because you supply your side of the matter, the output is framed from your perspective rather than as a neutral abstract. It is a fast, low-cost way to triage incoming paper.
Treat the result as a working summary, not the final word. Claude can miss nuance, misread an ambiguous clause, or overstate a risk, so the extraction is a draft to orient you — not legal advice and not a substitute for reading the operative language yourself before you act. The attorney remains responsible for verifying every point against the source document.
The Prompt
Read the following document and extract: 1. **Key points** — the 5-7 most important facts, terms, or conclusions 2. **Obligations** — what each party must do, with deadlines if stated 3. **Risks or concerns** — anything that could create problems 4. **Action items** — what I need to do next based on this document 5. **One-paragraph summary** — what this document is and why it matters Document type: [e.g., letter from opposing counsel, court order, contract amendment, client correspondence] My role: [e.g., plaintiff's counsel, buyer's attorney, outside counsel for employer] Document: [PASTE THE DOCUMENT]
Example Output
A structured breakdown with 5-7 bullet-point key takeaways, a list of obligations by party, flagged risks, and specific action items.
Illustrative example — names, figures, and facts are fictional.
DOCUMENT KEY POINTS Document type: Letter from opposing counsel | My role: Defendant's counsel (employer) ONE-PARAGRAPH SUMMARY This is a pre-suit demand from counsel for former employee Marcus Ellery, alleging unpaid overtime and retaliatory termination, and demanding $84,000 plus a response by July 1, 2026 before suit is filed. KEY POINTS 1. Claimant: Marcus Ellery, warehouse lead, employed Jan 2023-Apr 2026. 2. Two theories: FLSA overtime (misclassification) and retaliation for a March 2026 internal complaint. 3. Damages claimed: $51,200 unpaid OT + liquidated damages, totaling $84,000. 4. Counsel references "timekeeping records already in our possession." 5. Settlement offered in exchange for a full release and confidentiality. OBLIGATIONS / DEADLINES - Respond or acknowledge by July 1, 2026 (their stated deadline; not court-imposed). - No litigation hold yet issued internally — should be done immediately. RISKS OR CONCERNS - Retaliation timing (complaint to termination ~4 weeks) is the strongest part of their case. - Misclassification exposure may extend to other warehouse leads (collective-action risk). ACTION ITEMS 1. Issue a litigation hold on payroll, timekeeping, and HR files today. 2. Pull the classification analysis for the warehouse-lead role. 3. Calendar an internal response decision by June 24.
Tips
- •Specify your role so Claude frames the analysis from your perspective.
- •For long documents, ask Claude to organize key points by topic rather than page order.
- •Follow up with 'What should I be worried about?' for a second-pass risk analysis.
Frequently Asked Questions
When should I use the key points extractor instead of just reading the document?
Use it for triage the moment a document arrives — a filing, a letter, an amended contract — when you need to grasp the obligations and next steps before deciding how to spend real time on it. It is most valuable on long or dense documents. For short or high-stakes documents you will still read every word, but the extraction gives you a fast orientation first.
Can I rely on the extracted points without reviewing the original?
No. The output is a working summary to orient you, not a substitute for the source. Claude can miss a cross-reference, misread an ambiguous clause, or omit a defined term that changes meaning. Always confirm any obligation, deadline, or risk against the operative language before you act on it or advise a client.
How do I get the most accurate extraction?
Specify your role and the document type so the analysis is framed from your side. Paste the full text rather than excerpts, and for long documents ask Claude to organize key points by topic instead of page order. A useful second pass is to follow up with "What should I be most worried about here?" to surface risks the first read understated.
Is it safe to paste a client document into Claude?
Handle confidential and privileged material carefully. ABA Formal Opinion 512 and Model Rule 1.6 require lawyers to protect client information when using generative AI, which means understanding the tool's data practices and avoiding consumer tiers that may train on inputs. Use a business or enterprise offering with appropriate protections, and consider redacting identifiers when the substance does not require them.
Related Prompts
Get New Prompts Like This Every Week
Join the free Claude for Lawyers newsletter — weekly prompts, tutorials, and practice-specific guides.